18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Riken
Road Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
10
3
3
Best position
#2
#2
#2
Average position
6.0
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
104
40
34

Wet

Wet
Riken Road Performance
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Riken Road Performance
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Riken Road Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Costs

Costs
Riken Road Performance
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Riken Road Performance
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison