18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Riken Road Performance
RikenRiken

Road Performance

R15 – R16
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Riken
Road Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
—
10
3
Best position
—
#2
#2
Average position
—
6.0
3.7
Latest test
—
2026
2025
Available sizes
—
104
34

Wet

Wet
Riken Road Performance
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Riken Road Performance
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Riken Road Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Dry

Dry
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Costs

Costs
Riken Road Performance
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Riken Road Performance
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison