18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Riken Road Performance
RikenRiken

Road Performance

R15 – R16
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Also compare with
Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 5 Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Riken
Road Performance
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
—
10
26
Best position
—
#2
#1
Average position
—
6.0
2.2
Latest test
—
2026
2026
Available sizes
—
104
66

Wet

Wet
Riken Road Performance
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet braking
Riken Road Performance
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Aquaplaning - cross
Riken Road Performance
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Costs

Costs
Riken Road Performance
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
Riken Road Performance
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Dry

Dry
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Riken Road Performance
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison