18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Riken
Road Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
3
2
3
Best position
#2
#1
#2
Average position
3.3
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
40
23
34

Wet

Wet
Riken Road Performance
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Riken Road Performance
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Riken Road Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Dry

Dry
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Costs

Costs
Riken Road Performance
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Riken Road Performance
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Riken Road Performance
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison