18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

Riken
Road Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
18
14
Best position
#1
#8
Average position
6.1
13.4
Latest test
2024
2026
Available sizes
47
153

Wet

Wet
Riken Road Performance
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Riken Road Performance
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet braking
Riken Road Performance
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Riken Road Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%

Dry

Dry
Riken Road Performance
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry braking
Riken Road Performance
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%

Costs

Costs
Riken Road Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Mileage
Riken Road Performance
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Comfort

Comfort
Riken Road Performance
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Riken Road Performance
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2021205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison