18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

Riken Road Performance
RikenRiken

Road Performance

R15 – R16
Firestone Multiseason 2Upper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Multiseason 2

5.5
R13 – R19
Kumho HA32 Solus 4SUpper-middle
KumhoKumho

HA32 Solus 4S

4.9
R13 – R20
Also compare with
Cinturato All Season SF3 Quatrac CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Riken
Road Performance
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Number of tests
—
13
9
Best position
—
#6
#5
Average position
—
10.9
10.8
Latest test
—
2025
2023
Available sizes
—
61
73

Wet

Wet
Riken Road Performance
70%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
67%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Wet braking
Riken Road Performance
63%
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Riken Road Performance
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
62%

Dry

Dry
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
68%
Dry braking
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
63%

Costs

Costs
Riken Road Performance
67%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
65%
Mileage
Riken Road Performance
67%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
70%

Comfort

Comfort
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
76%
Exterior noise
Riken Road Performance
74%
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison