18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Riken
Road Performance
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
14
10
3
Best position
#8
#2
#2
Average position
13.4
6.0
3.3
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
153
104
40

Wet

Wet
Riken Road Performance
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet braking
Riken Road Performance
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Riken Road Performance
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Costs

Costs
Riken Road Performance
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Riken Road Performance
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dry

Dry
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison