18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Riken Road Performance
RikenRiken

Road Performance

R15 – R16
BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Also compare with
Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Riken
Road Performance
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
—
14
10
Best position
—
#8
#2
Average position
—
13.4
6.0
Latest test
—
2026
2026
Available sizes
—
153
104

Wet

Wet
Riken Road Performance
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Riken Road Performance
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Riken Road Performance
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Costs

Costs
Riken Road Performance
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Riken Road Performance
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Dry

Dry
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison