18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Riken
Road Performance
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
14
3
2
Best position
#8
#2
#1
Average position
13.4
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
153
40
23

Wet

Wet
Riken Road Performance
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Wet braking
Riken Road Performance
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Aquaplaning - cross
Riken Road Performance
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%

Comfort

Comfort
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Dry

Dry
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry braking
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%

Costs

Costs
Riken Road Performance
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
Riken Road Performance
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison