Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Riken

Road Performance

R15 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Road Performance

Advantage

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Number of tests

—

14

5

3

Best position

—

#8

#1

#2

Average position

—

13.4

2.2

3.7

Latest test

—

2026

2025

Available sizes

—

153

63

34

Wet

Riken Road Performance

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Riken Road Performance

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Riken Road Performance

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Riken Road Performance

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dry

Riken Road Performance

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Riken Road Performance

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Costs

Riken Road Performance

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Riken Road Performance

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Riken Road Performance

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Riken Road Performance

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Road Performance

Advantage

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison