18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Riken Road Performance
RikenRiken

Road Performance

R15 – R16
BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Also compare with
Turanza T005 Ecsta HS52 Proxes Comfort

Test Profile

Riken
Road Performance
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Number of tests
—
14
18
Best position
—
#8
#1
Average position
—
13.4
6.1
Latest test
—
2026
2024
Available sizes
—
153
47

Wet

Wet
Riken Road Performance
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Wet braking
Riken Road Performance
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
Riken Road Performance
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Dry

Dry
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Costs

Costs
Riken Road Performance
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Mileage
Riken Road Performance
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Comfort

Comfort
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Exterior noise
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2021205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison