18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Riken Road Performance vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Riken Road Performance
RikenRiken

Road Performance

R15 – R16
BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Also compare with
Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Riken
Road Performance
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
—
14
2
Best position
—
#8
#1
Average position
—
13.4
1.0
Latest test
—
2026
2025
Available sizes
—
153
23

Wet

Wet
Riken Road Performance
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet braking
Riken Road Performance
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Aquaplaning - cross
Riken Road Performance
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%

Dry

Dry
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry braking
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%

Costs

Costs
Riken Road Performance
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
Riken Road Performance
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Comfort

Comfort
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Riken Road Performance
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison