18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Test Profile

Pirelli
Winter Sottozero 3
Firestone
Winterhawk 3
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Number of tests
27
14
29
Best position
#2
#3
#1
Average position
8.1
16.0
3.7
Latest test
2021
2020
2025
Available sizes
25
66
178

Dry

Dry
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
80%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
Dry braking
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
86%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Dry handling
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
82%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Dry driving behavior
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
53%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Dry steering response
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Dry lane changing
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Dry performance
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
66%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%

Snow

Snow
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
78%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%
Snow braking
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
76%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Snow handling
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
81%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Snow traction
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
69%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
75%
Snow cornering
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Snow performance
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
72%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
85%

Wet

Wet
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
73%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Wet braking
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
76%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Wet handling
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
71%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
57%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
76%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Wet circle cornering
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
70%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
67%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Wet performance
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
77%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
62%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
69%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Exterior noise
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
71%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Comfort
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
76%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Interior noise
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
72%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%

Costs

Costs
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
73%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Rolling resistance
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
81%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Mileage
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
66%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
37%
Fuel efficiency
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
79%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
85%
Price/value
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
55%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%

Ice

Ice
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
74%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Ice braking
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
73%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
83%
Ice lateral guidance
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
72%
Firestone Winterhawk 3
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison