Comparison: Pirelli SCORPION vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Pirelli

SCORPION

R17 – R22

VS

Premium

Vredestein

ULTRAC

Ecsta HS52

7.4

R14 – R20

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

Test Profile

SCORPION

ULTRAC

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

—

10

Best position

—

#2

Average position

—

6.0

Latest test

—

2026

Available sizes

—

104

Wet

Pirelli SCORPION

72%

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli SCORPION

74%

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli SCORPION

72%

Vredestein ULTRAC

93%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Wet handling

Pirelli SCORPION

65%

Vredestein ULTRAC

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Wet braking

Pirelli SCORPION

72%

Vredestein ULTRAC

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli SCORPION

80%

Vredestein ULTRAC

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Offroad

Pirelli SCORPION

80%

Vredestein ULTRAC

76%

Comfort

Pirelli SCORPION

81%

Vredestein ULTRAC

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Comfort

Pirelli SCORPION

90%

Vredestein ULTRAC

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

Exterior noise

Pirelli SCORPION

79%

Vredestein ULTRAC

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Dry

Pirelli SCORPION

79%

Vredestein ULTRAC

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dry braking

Pirelli SCORPION

85%

Vredestein ULTRAC

86%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Dry handling

Pirelli SCORPION

72%

Vredestein ULTRAC

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Costs

Pirelli SCORPION

79%

Vredestein ULTRAC

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Rolling resistance

Pirelli SCORPION

79%

Vredestein ULTRAC

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli SCORPION vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

SCORPION

ULTRAC

Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Wet

Offroad

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison