Comparison: Pirelli SCORPION vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Pirelli

SCORPION

R17 – R22

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

SCORPION

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ecsta PS71

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

—

4

3

15

3

5

Best position

—

#3

#2

#1

Average position

—

12.0

3.3

9.0

3.7

2.2

Latest test

—

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

—

111

40

225

34

63

Wet

Pirelli SCORPION

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet braking

Pirelli SCORPION

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli SCORPION

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli SCORPION

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet handling

Pirelli SCORPION

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli SCORPION

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Offroad

Pirelli SCORPION

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Grass traction

Pirelli SCORPION

82%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Gravel traction

Pirelli SCORPION

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Comfort

Pirelli SCORPION

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Comfort

Pirelli SCORPION

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Exterior noise

Pirelli SCORPION

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Dry

Pirelli SCORPION

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry handling

Pirelli SCORPION

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dry braking

Pirelli SCORPION

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Costs

Pirelli SCORPION

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

Pirelli SCORPION

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli SCORPION vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

SCORPION

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ecsta PS71

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Offroad

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison