Comparison: Pirelli SCORPION vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Pirelli

SCORPION

R17 – R22

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

SCORPION

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

—

3

14

5

Best position

—

#2

#1

Average position

—

3.7

3.3

5.5

2.2

Latest test

—

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

—

34

40

60

706

63

Wet

Pirelli SCORPION

72%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet braking

Pirelli SCORPION

72%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli SCORPION

74%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli SCORPION

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet handling

Pirelli SCORPION

65%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli SCORPION

80%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Offroad

Pirelli SCORPION

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Comfort

Pirelli SCORPION

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Comfort

Pirelli SCORPION

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Exterior noise

Pirelli SCORPION

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Dry

Pirelli SCORPION

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry handling

Pirelli SCORPION

72%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dry braking

Pirelli SCORPION

85%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Costs

Pirelli SCORPION

79%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

Pirelli SCORPION

79%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli SCORPION vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

SCORPION

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Offroad

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison