Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

P ZERO

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

SportContact 7

Number of tests

17

4

3

15

Best position

#1

#3

#2

#1

Average position

6.1

12.0

3.3

3.7

1.2

Latest test

2020

2025

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

330

111

40

34

122

Wet

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental SportContact 7

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental SportContact 7

85%

Wet braking

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental SportContact 7

95%

Wet handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental SportContact 7

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental SportContact 7

66%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental SportContact 7

86%

Wet side guide

Pirelli P ZERO

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental SportContact 7

80%

Dry

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental SportContact 7

91%

Dry braking

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental SportContact 7

97%

Dry handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental SportContact 7

94%

Dry lane changing

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental SportContact 7

86%

Dry steering response

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental SportContact 7

85%

Costs

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Rolling resistance

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Mileage

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental SportContact 7

78%

Exterior noise

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental SportContact 7

75%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Continental SportContact 7

70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

P ZERO

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

SportContact 7

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison