Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

P ZERO

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

17

4

3

26

2

Best position

#1

#3

#2

#1

Average position

6.1

12.0

3.3

2.2

1.0

Latest test

2020

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

329

111

40

66

23

Wet

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet braking

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Wet side guide

Pirelli P ZERO

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Continental PremiumContact 7

100%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dry lane changing

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Dry steering response

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

96%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Costs

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

P ZERO

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison