Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

P ZERO

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

17

4

18

1

2

Best position

#1

#3

#1

Average position

6.1

12.0

6.1

1.0

Latest test

2020

2025

2024

2025

Available sizes

329

111

47

64

23

Wet

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet braking

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Wet side guide

Pirelli P ZERO

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dry lane changing

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Dry steering response

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

Costs

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

P ZERO

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison