Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

P ZERO

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

ION Evo

Number of tests

17

3

1

Best position

#1

Average position

6.1

4.0

1.0

Latest test

2020

2026

2025

Available sizes

330

54

64

Wet

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Costs

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook ION Evo

P ZERO

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison