Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

P ZERO

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

17

10

4

3

26

Best position

#1

#2

#3

#2

#1

Average position

6.1

6.0

12.0

3.3

2.2

Latest test

2020

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

330

104

111

40

66

Wet

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Wet braking

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Wet handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Dry

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry braking

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Dry lane changing

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Dry steering response

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

96%

Costs

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Rolling resistance

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Mileage

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Price/value

Pirelli P ZERO

23%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

97%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Exterior noise

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Interior noise

Pirelli P ZERO

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

P ZERO

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison