18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Pirelli
P ZERO
Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
17
1
10
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
6.1
1.0
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2020
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
330
64
104
34

Wet

Wet
Pirelli P ZERO
88%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Pirelli P ZERO
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Pirelli P ZERO
83%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Pirelli P ZERO
94%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Pirelli P ZERO
67%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Pirelli P ZERO
97%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Pirelli P ZERO
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Pirelli P ZERO
91%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Pirelli P ZERO
94%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Costs

Costs
Pirelli P ZERO
53%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Pirelli P ZERO
51%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Pirelli P ZERO
64%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Pirelli P ZERO
73%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Pirelli P ZERO
74%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison