Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

P ZERO

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 4+

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

17

3

13

3

2

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

6.1

3.3

4.3

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2020

2026

2025

Available sizes

330

40

123

34

23

Wet

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet braking

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Wet side guide

Pirelli P ZERO

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Michelin Primacy 4+

70%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dry steering response

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Michelin Primacy 4+

90%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Dry lane changing

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 4+

74%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Costs

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin Primacy 4+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin Primacy 4+

91%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

P ZERO

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 4+

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison