18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Pirelli
P ZERO
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
17
3
10
18
4
6
1
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#1
#3
#3
#1
Average position
6.1
3.3
6.0
6.1
12.0
4.7
1.0
Latest test
2020
2026
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
330
40
104
47
111
146
64

Wet

Wet
Pirelli P ZERO
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Pirelli P ZERO
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Pirelli P ZERO
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Pirelli P ZERO
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet braking
Pirelli P ZERO
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Pirelli P ZERO
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Pirelli P ZERO
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Pirelli P ZERO
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Pirelli P ZERO
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry lane changing
Pirelli P ZERO
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%

Costs

Costs
Pirelli P ZERO
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Pirelli P ZERO
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Pirelli P ZERO
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Pirelli P ZERO
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Pirelli P ZERO
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Pirelli P ZERO
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison