Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

P ZERO

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraContact NXT

ION Evo

Number of tests

17

3

5

2

1

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

6.1

3.3

3.7

2.2

1.0

Latest test

2020

2026

2025

Available sizes

329

40

34

63

23

64

Wet

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Costs

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Hankook ION Evo

P ZERO

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraContact NXT

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison