Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

P ZERO

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

e.Primacy

Potenza Sport

Number of tests

17

3

2

4

23

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#3

#1

Average position

6.1

3.3

1.0

12.0

3.3

Latest test

2020

2026

2025

Available sizes

330

40

23

111

188

Wet

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

79%

Wet braking

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

86%

Wet handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

93%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

75%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

92%

Wet side guide

Pirelli P ZERO

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

94%

Dry

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

Dry braking

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

88%

Dry handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

85%

Dry lane changing

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

86%

Dry steering response

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

97%

Costs

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

61%

Rolling resistance

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

58%

Mileage

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

85%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

80%

Exterior noise

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

70%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

P ZERO

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

e.Primacy

Potenza Sport

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison