Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

P ZERO

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Number of tests

17

18

4

3

1

Best position

#1

#3

#2

#1

Average position

6.1

12.0

3.3

1.0

Latest test

2020

2024

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

330

47

111

40

64

Wet

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet side guide

Pirelli P ZERO

100%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Dry

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry lane changing

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Dry steering response

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

92%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Costs

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

P ZERO

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison