Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

P ZERO

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

17

3

1

2

Best position

#1

#2

#1

Average position

6.1

3.7

3.3

1.0

Latest test

2020

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

330

34

40

64

23

Wet

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet braking

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Dry

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dry lane changing

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Dry steering response

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Costs

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

P ZERO

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison