Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Premium

Continental

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

P ZERO

UltraContact NXT

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

17

2

4

3

Best position

#1

#3

#2

Average position

6.1

1.0

12.0

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2020

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

330

23

111

40

34

Wet

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet braking

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet side guide

Pirelli P ZERO

100%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry steering response

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Dry lane changing

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Costs

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

P ZERO

UltraContact NXT

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison