Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Premium

Continental

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

P ZERO

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

17

26

3

Best position

#1

#2

Average position

6.1

2.2

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2020

2026

2025

Available sizes

330

66

40

60

34

Wet

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry lane changing

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry steering response

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Costs

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Pirelli P ZERO

23%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

P ZERO

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison