Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Pirelli

P ZERO

R17 – R22

VS

Premium

Continental

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

P ZERO

EcoContact 6

Dynaxer HP4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

17

5

11

3

Best position

#1

#7

#1

#2

Average position

6.1

13.0

11.6

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2020

2022

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

330

676

121

40

34

Wet

Pirelli P ZERO

88%

Continental EcoContact 6

60%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli P ZERO

78%

Continental EcoContact 6

61%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Pirelli P ZERO

83%

Continental EcoContact 6

66%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Continental EcoContact 6

57%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli P ZERO

67%

Continental EcoContact 6

40%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli P ZERO

97%

Continental EcoContact 6

69%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Pirelli P ZERO

90%

Continental EcoContact 6

77%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Pirelli P ZERO

94%

Continental EcoContact 6

70%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry lane changing

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Continental EcoContact 6

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry driving behavior

Pirelli P ZERO

91%

Continental EcoContact 6

73%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Costs

Pirelli P ZERO

53%

Continental EcoContact 6

93%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Pirelli P ZERO

51%

Continental EcoContact 6

100%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Pirelli P ZERO

64%

Continental EcoContact 6

89%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Fuel efficiency

Pirelli P ZERO

69%

Continental EcoContact 6

99%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

73%

Continental EcoContact 6

84%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Pirelli P ZERO

74%

Continental EcoContact 6

85%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Pirelli P ZERO

85%

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Interior noise

Pirelli P ZERO

69%

Continental EcoContact 6

83%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli P ZERO vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

P ZERO

EcoContact 6

Dynaxer HP4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison