Comparison: Pirelli P Zero Winter vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

Pirelli

P Zero Winter

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

P Zero Winter

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Winter

Number of tests

1

3

49

23

3

2

Best position

#9

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

9.0

3.3

3.2

3.3

3.7

1.5

Latest test

2024

2026

2024

2025

Available sizes

85

40

213

176

34

65

Wet

Pirelli P Zero Winter

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Wet handling

Pirelli P Zero Winter

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli P Zero Winter

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli P Zero Winter

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Wet braking

Pirelli P Zero Winter

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli P Zero Winter

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Offroad

Pirelli P Zero Winter

66%

Dry

Pirelli P Zero Winter

58%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Dry handling

Pirelli P Zero Winter

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Dry braking

Pirelli P Zero Winter

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Comfort

Pirelli P Zero Winter

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Comfort

Pirelli P Zero Winter

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Exterior noise

Pirelli P Zero Winter

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Costs

Pirelli P Zero Winter

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Rolling resistance

Pirelli P Zero Winter

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Snow

Pirelli P Zero Winter

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Snow traction

Pirelli P Zero Winter

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli P Zero Winter vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

P Zero Winter

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Winter

Test Profile

Wet

Offroad

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Snow

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison