18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Pirelli P Zero Winter vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Pirelli
P Zero Winter
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Number of tests
1
16
18
23
3
17
Best position
#9
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
9.0
5.5
6.1
3.3
3.7
1.7
Latest test
2024
2023
2024
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
85
153
47
176
34
80

Wet

Wet
Pirelli P Zero Winter
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Pirelli P Zero Winter
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Wet braking
Pirelli P Zero Winter
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Wet circle cornering
Pirelli P Zero Winter
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Wet handling
Pirelli P Zero Winter
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Pirelli P Zero Winter
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%

Offroad

Offroad
Pirelli P Zero Winter
66%

Dry

Dry
Pirelli P Zero Winter
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Dry braking
Pirelli P Zero Winter
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Dry handling
Pirelli P Zero Winter
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Pirelli P Zero Winter
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Comfort
Pirelli P Zero Winter
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Exterior noise
Pirelli P Zero Winter
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%

Snow

Snow
Pirelli P Zero Winter
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow traction
Pirelli P Zero Winter
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%

Costs

Costs
Pirelli P Zero Winter
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Rolling resistance
Pirelli P Zero Winter
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison