Comparison: Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Premium

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

R14 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

CARRIER WINTER

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

10

3

Best position

#2

Average position

2.0

6.0

3.7

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

Available sizes

36

104

34

Wet

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

67%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dry

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

74%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Snow

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

73%

Comfort

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

64%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Ice

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

77%

Costs

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

78%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

CARRIER WINTER

Ecsta HS52

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Snow

Comfort

Ice

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison