Comparison: Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

Premium

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

R14 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Test Profile

CARRIER WINTER

EuroWinter VAN01

Blizzak W810

PorTran CW51

Number of tests

1

Best position

#2

#6

#7

#8

Average position

2.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

Latest test

2019

Available sizes

36

32

56

21

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

69%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

67%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

56%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

65%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Wet Braking

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

69%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

40%

Kumho PorTran CW51

49%

Wet Handling

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

57%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

57%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

34%

Kumho PorTran CW51

46%

Wet Circle Cornering

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

72%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

61%

Kumho PorTran CW51

72%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

67%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Aquaplaning Cross

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Dry Performance

71%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

89%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

78%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

78%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Dry Braking

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

71%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Snow Performance

75%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

49%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

70%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Snow Braking

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Snow Traction

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

83%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

50%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

83%

Kumho PorTran CW51

72%

Snow Handling

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

64%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

40%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

76%

Kumho PorTran CW51

60%

Ice Performance

78%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

86%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

74%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

78%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Ice Braking Abs

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

74%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Kumho PorTran CW51

81%

Ice Lateral Guidance

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

81%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Kumho PorTran CW51

74%

Comfort & Noise

64%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

81%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

56%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

71%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Noise Exterior

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

56%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

44%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Noise Interior

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

71%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Economy

83%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

89%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

76%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

76%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Fuel Efficiency

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

87%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

84%

Kumho PorTran CW51

84%

Mileage

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

78%

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Kumho PorTran CW51

67%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
ADAC	Winter	2019	205/65 R16	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

CARRIER WINTER

EuroWinter VAN01

Blizzak W810

PorTran CW51

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison