Comparison: Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

R14 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

CARRIER WINTER

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

1

3

1

Best position

#2

#1

Average position

2.0

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

36

34

64

Wet

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

66%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

67%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

69%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet handling

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

78%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Snow

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

73%

Dry

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

71%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Comfort

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

64%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

56%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Costs

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Ice

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

CARRIER WINTER

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison