Comparison: Petlas Snowmaster W651 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Budget

Petlas

Snowmaster W651

VS

e.Ziex

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Snowmaster W651

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

6

3

1

Best position

#9

#2

#1

Average position

38.0

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2023

2025

Available sizes

11

34

64

Wet

Petlas Snowmaster W651

37%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Petlas Snowmaster W651

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Petlas Snowmaster W651

43%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet handling

Petlas Snowmaster W651

4%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Petlas Snowmaster W651

33%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Snow

Petlas Snowmaster W651

98%

Dry

Petlas Snowmaster W651

63%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Petlas Snowmaster W651

81%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Petlas Snowmaster W651

44%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Petlas Snowmaster W651 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Snowmaster W651

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison