Comparison: Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Budget

Petlas

Imperium PT515

VS

Ecsta PS71

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Imperium PT515

Ecsta PS71

ION Evo

Number of tests

5

15

1

Best position

#13

#2

#1

Average position

24.0

9.0

1.0

Latest test

2024

2025

Available sizes

11

225

64

Wet

Petlas Imperium PT515

54%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

Petlas Imperium PT515

55%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - cross

Petlas Imperium PT515

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Petlas Imperium PT515

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet circle cornering

Petlas Imperium PT515

60%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet handling

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

Petlas Imperium PT515

46%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Petlas Imperium PT515

63%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry driving behavior

Petlas Imperium PT515

51%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Dry handling

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Petlas Imperium PT515

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Interior noise

Petlas Imperium PT515

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

66%

Costs

Petlas Imperium PT515

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Fuel efficiency

Petlas Imperium PT515

65%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

83%

Mileage

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Imperium PT515

Ecsta PS71

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison