Comparison: Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Budget

Petlas

Imperium PT515

VS

ION Evo

Ecsta PS71

8.3

R16 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Imperium PT515

ION Evo

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

5

1

15

Best position

#13

#1

#2

Average position

24.0

1.0

9.0

Latest test

2024

2025

Available sizes

11

64

225

Wet

Petlas Imperium PT515

54%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet braking

Petlas Imperium PT515

55%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Petlas Imperium PT515

66%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Petlas Imperium PT515

71%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Wet circle cornering

Petlas Imperium PT515

60%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Wet handling

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Dry

Petlas Imperium PT515

46%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry braking

Petlas Imperium PT515

63%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Dry driving behavior

Petlas Imperium PT515

51%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Dry handling

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Comfort

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

Petlas Imperium PT515

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Interior noise

Petlas Imperium PT515

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

66%

Costs

Petlas Imperium PT515

72%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Fuel efficiency

Petlas Imperium PT515

65%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

83%

Mileage

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Imperium PT515

ION Evo

Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison