Comparison: Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Budget

Petlas

Imperium PT515

VS

ION Evo

Ecsta HS52

7.4

R14 – R20

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Imperium PT515

ION Evo

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

5

1

10

Best position

#13

#1

#2

Average position

24.0

1.0

6.0

Latest test

2024

2025

2026

Available sizes

11

64

104

Wet

Petlas Imperium PT515

54%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Wet braking

Petlas Imperium PT515

55%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Aquaplaning - cross

Petlas Imperium PT515

66%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Petlas Imperium PT515

71%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Wet circle cornering

Petlas Imperium PT515

60%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Wet handling

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Dry

Petlas Imperium PT515

46%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dry braking

Petlas Imperium PT515

63%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Dry handling

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Comfort

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

Petlas Imperium PT515

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Costs

Petlas Imperium PT515

72%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Mileage

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Imperium PT515

ION Evo

Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison