Comparison: Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Budget

Petlas

Imperium PT515

VS

e.Ziex

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

9.3

R17 – R23

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Imperium PT515

e.Ziex

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Number of tests

5

3

7

Best position

#13

#2

#1

Average position

24.0

3.7

2.4

Latest test

2024

2025

Available sizes

11

34

137

Wet

Petlas Imperium PT515

54%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

88%

Wet braking

Petlas Imperium PT515

55%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

Petlas Imperium PT515

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Petlas Imperium PT515

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

94%

Wet circle cornering

Petlas Imperium PT515

60%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

91%

Wet handling

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

87%

Dry

Petlas Imperium PT515

46%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

86%

Dry braking

Petlas Imperium PT515

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

84%

Dry handling

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

91%

Comfort

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

63%

Exterior noise

Petlas Imperium PT515

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

71%

Costs

Petlas Imperium PT515

72%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

64%

Fuel efficiency

Petlas Imperium PT515

65%

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

60%

Mileage

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Imperium PT515

e.Ziex

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison