Comparison: Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Budget

Petlas

Imperium PT515

VS

e.Ziex

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Imperium PT515

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

5

3

1

Best position

#13

#2

#1

Average position

24.0

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2024

2025

Available sizes

11

34

64

Wet

Petlas Imperium PT515

54%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Petlas Imperium PT515

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Petlas Imperium PT515

55%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - cross

Petlas Imperium PT515

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Petlas Imperium PT515

60%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet handling

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

Petlas Imperium PT515

46%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Petlas Imperium PT515

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Petlas Imperium PT515

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Costs

Petlas Imperium PT515

72%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Mileage

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Imperium PT515

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison