Comparison: Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Budget

Petlas

Imperium PT515

VS

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

9.5

R16 – R20

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Imperium PT515

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

5

3

2

Best position

#13

#2

#1

Average position

24.0

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2024

2025

Available sizes

11

34

23

Wet

Petlas Imperium PT515

54%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Petlas Imperium PT515

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet braking

Petlas Imperium PT515

55%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Aquaplaning - cross

Petlas Imperium PT515

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet circle cornering

Petlas Imperium PT515

60%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Wet handling

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Dry

Petlas Imperium PT515

46%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

Petlas Imperium PT515

63%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Comfort

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Petlas Imperium PT515

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Costs

Petlas Imperium PT515

72%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Imperium PT515

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison