Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Upper-middle

Nokian

zLine

R16 – R21

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

9.8

R16 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

zLine

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

8

3

26

Best position

#3

#2

#1

Average position

7.4

3.7

2.2

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

Available sizes

45

34

66

Wet

Nokian zLine

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian zLine

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Wet braking

Nokian zLine

90%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian zLine

60%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Wet handling

Nokian zLine

85%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian zLine

75%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Dry

Nokian zLine

89%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry braking

Nokian zLine

85%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Dry handling

Nokian zLine

93%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Costs

Nokian zLine

90%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Rolling resistance

Nokian zLine

90%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Comfort

Nokian zLine

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Exterior noise

Nokian zLine

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Nokian zLine vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

zLine

e.Ziex

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison