18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian WR SUV 3 vs. Michelin ALPIN 7

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR SUV 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2025 when was the Michelin ALPIN 7 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin ALPIN 7 has B rating.

Test Profile

Nokian
WR SUV 3
Michelin
ALPIN 7
Number of tests
4
6
Best position
#1
#1
Average position
4.3
3.7
Latest test
2018
2025
Available sizes
62
62

Wet

Wet
Nokian WR SUV 3
88%
Michelin ALPIN 7
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian WR SUV 3
92%
Michelin ALPIN 7
87%
Wet braking
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Michelin ALPIN 7
80%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Michelin ALPIN 7
87%
Wet handling
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Michelin ALPIN 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Michelin ALPIN 7
78%

Snow

Snow
Nokian WR SUV 3
90%
Michelin ALPIN 7
88%
Snow traction
Nokian WR SUV 3
75%
Michelin ALPIN 7
85%
Snow braking
Nokian WR SUV 3
93%
Michelin ALPIN 7
88%
Snow cornering
Nokian WR SUV 3
94%
Michelin ALPIN 7
86%
Snow handling
Nokian WR SUV 3
93%
Michelin ALPIN 7
90%

Dry

Dry
Nokian WR SUV 3
95%
Michelin ALPIN 7
80%
Dry braking
Nokian WR SUV 3
93%
Michelin ALPIN 7
83%
Dry handling
Nokian WR SUV 3
100%
Michelin ALPIN 7
86%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Michelin ALPIN 7
93%
Exterior noise
Nokian WR SUV 3
80%
Michelin ALPIN 7
84%
Comfort
Nokian WR SUV 3
75%
Michelin ALPIN 7
84%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WR SUV 3
60%
Michelin ALPIN 7
95%
Rolling resistance
Nokian WR SUV 3
60%
Michelin ALPIN 7
95%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison