18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

Test Profile

Nokian
WR Snowproof P
Falken
e.Ziex
Dunlop
Winter
Number of tests
7
3
2
Best position
#4
#2
#1
Average position
9.7
3.7
1.5
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
55
34
65

Snow

Snow
Nokian WR Snowproof P
77%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Snow braking
Nokian WR Snowproof P
83%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Snow handling
Nokian WR Snowproof P
68%
Dunlop Winter
79%
Snow traction
Nokian WR Snowproof P
78%
Dunlop Winter
96%
Snow cornering
Nokian WR Snowproof P
64%
Dunlop Winter
96%

Wet

Wet
Nokian WR Snowproof P
64%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet braking
Nokian WR Snowproof P
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Wet handling
Nokian WR Snowproof P
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian WR Snowproof P
60%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian WR Snowproof P
75%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian WR Snowproof P
35%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Dunlop Winter
73%

Dry

Dry
Nokian WR Snowproof P
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Dry handling
Nokian WR Snowproof P
88%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Dry braking
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dunlop Winter
73%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WR Snowproof P
85%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Rolling resistance
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Dunlop Winter
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Comfort
Nokian WR Snowproof P
71%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Exterior noise
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison