Comparison: Nokian WR C3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Upper-middle

Nokian

WR C3

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0

R15 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

WR C3

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Number of tests

1

49

23

Best position

#7

#1

Average position

7.0

3.2

3.3

Latest test

2018

2024

2025

Available sizes

23

213

176

Wet

Nokian WR C3

31%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian WR C3

25%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian WR C3

33%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian WR C3

33%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Wet handling

Nokian WR C3

33%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Wet braking

Nokian WR C3

25%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Snow

Nokian WR C3

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Snow braking

Nokian WR C3

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Snow cornering

Nokian WR C3

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Snow handling

Nokian WR C3

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Snow traction

Nokian WR C3

100%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dry

Nokian WR C3

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Dry lane changing

Nokian WR C3

53%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Dry steering response

Nokian WR C3

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Dry braking

Nokian WR C3

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Dry handling

Nokian WR C3

53%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Comfort

Nokian WR C3

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Exterior noise

Nokian WR C3

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Interior noise

Nokian WR C3

50%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Costs

Nokian WR C3

43%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Rolling resistance

Nokian WR C3

43%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Nokian WR C3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

WR C3

Blizzak LM-005

UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison