Comparison: Nokian WR A4 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Upper-middle

Nokian

WR A4

R16 – R21

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

8.1

R14 – R20

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (60%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the WR A4 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Nokian WR A4 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 also have B wet ratings.

Test Profile

WR A4

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Number of tests

6

23

Best position

#5

#1

Average position

9.8

6.7

Latest test

2020

2025

Available sizes

59

107

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

62%

Nokian

WR A4

73%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Wet Braking

Nokian WR A4

63%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

63%

Wet Handling

Nokian WR A4

63%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Wet Circle Cornering

Nokian WR A4

64%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Nokian WR A4

59%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Aquaplaning Cross

Nokian WR A4

59%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Dry Performance

73%

Nokian

WR A4

69%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Dry Braking

Nokian WR A4

73%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Dry Handling

Nokian WR A4

73%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

64%

Snow Performance

64%

Nokian

WR A4

86%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Snow Braking

Nokian WR A4

66%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

86%

Snow Traction

Nokian WR A4

73%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

82%

Snow Handling

Nokian WR A4

59%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Snow Circle Cornering

Nokian WR A4

56%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

91%

Comfort & Noise

71%

Nokian

WR A4

81%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Noise Exterior

Nokian WR A4

81%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

90%

Ride Comfort

Nokian WR A4

61%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Economy

74%

Nokian

WR A4

85%

BFGoodrich

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Rolling Resistance

Nokian WR A4

84%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Mileage

Nokian WR A4

64%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

85%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Winter	2020	245/45 R18	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Nokian WR A4 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

WR A4

G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison