Comparison: Nokian WetProof vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Upper-middle

Nokian

WetProof

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

WetProof

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Number of tests

14

4

3

1

14

Best position

#1

#3

#2

#1

#2

Average position

5.6

12.0

3.3

1.0

5.5

Latest test

2023

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

47

111

40

64

706

Wet

Nokian WetProof

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian WetProof

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian WetProof

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Wet braking

Nokian WetProof

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Wet handling

Nokian WetProof

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian WetProof

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Wet side guide

Nokian WetProof

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Dry

Nokian WetProof

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Dry braking

Nokian WetProof

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Dry handling

Nokian WetProof

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Dry lane changing

Nokian WetProof

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

85%

Dry steering response

Nokian WetProof

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

84%

Comfort

Nokian WetProof

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Exterior noise

Nokian WetProof

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Comfort

Nokian WetProof

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

74%

Costs

Nokian WetProof

60%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Rolling resistance

Nokian WetProof

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Mileage

Nokian WetProof

56%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Nokian WetProof vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

WetProof

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison