18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Nokian WetProof vs. Kenda KR41 Emera A1

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kenda (58%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the WetProof and the KR41 Emera A1 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where WetProof is made - Finland.

Test Profile

Nokian
WetProof
Kenda
KR41 Emera A1
Number of tests
14
2
Best position
#1
#7
Average position
5.6
13.0
Latest test
2023
2019
Available sizes
47

Wet

Wet
Nokian WetProof
84%
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
91%

Dry

Dry
Nokian WetProof
78%
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
96%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WetProof
79%
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
80%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WetProof
60%
Kenda KR41 Emera A1
45%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2019225/45 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2019225/45 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison